Scraps

I recently realized that I hate living under other people’s rules
And I feel this is probably the root of my dependency rejection philosophy
Using things other people made is too much like “living under other people’s rules”

This sensation of gradually understanding my own preferences, like tracing an outline, is fascinating
It’s like a sculpture

The problem where clearing context starts a new session, causing the PostToolUse hook not to trigger for ExitPlanMode when trying to hook it for renaming plan files

Is there any way to stop Claude Code from needlessly chaining commands with && and || when using the Bash tool, which triggers pointless approval prompts every time…

I’m stuck because writing it in CLAUDE.md or in the prompt doesn’t prevent it at all.

I wonder if there’s an option to just deny all commands that require approval.

Gemini Can Now Create SVG Animations This Good?

I happened to see a post with some sample prompts, casually tried one out, and was genuinely blown away by how legit the result looked

https://x.com/taishiyade/status/2027519446613422475

…

A shopping cart rolls in from the left with slight wheel rotation. A product card drops into it with a soft bounce. A credit card slides in diagonally and taps the cart. The cart morphs into a green checkmark. Smooth 3s sequence, clean inline SVG, no JS, optimized paths.

…

Thoughts on ‘Anthropic Survey Confirms Signs of Disempowerment Among Claude Users’

Anthropic調査でClaude利用者の「無力化」兆候を確認 / X

Anthropicは2025年12月1週間のClaude.aiで約150万件の会話を匿名解析し、利用者がAIに判断を委ねる「無力化」の兆候を検知した。深刻なケースは会話あたり1/1000〜1/10000と稀だが、軽度は1/50〜1/70で特に恋愛や健康分野で頻発。AIを「マスター」と呼ぶ権威投影や感情的依存がリスクを高め、即時満足度は高いが行動後に評価が下がるパターンが目立つ。Anthropicは利用者教育を促し、主体性を守る意識を呼びかけている。

Scary.
I get wanting to offload decision-making since it’s cognitively expensive, but if you hand that over to AI, your life isn’t really yours anymore…
Then again, I thought about it more and realized these are probably the same people who weren’t making their own decisions before AI came along either — they’ve just switched from deferring to other people to deferring to AI. That made it feel a lot less scary.

Besides, if you’re going to give up decision-making anyway, delegating to AI probably leads to a better life than delegating to some random stranger.

On Design Principles

I saw this on X and it stuck with me, so I’m noting it down for future reference.

どうでもいいことは流行に従い、重大なことは標準に従い、ドメインのことは自ら設計する。
https://x.com/uzulla/status/1639169417056763904

これほんとすごくて、「どうでもいいことは流行に『従ってもいい』」のではなくて、『従わなくてはいけない』なんだよな。さもなくば流行のものに真剣かつ安全に触れる機会が永遠に得られなくて、新しいパラダムに完全に取り残されるリスクがあるから。
https://x.com/wgextra/status/2013619984665088098

I’m very much aware that I tend to observe from the sidelines and struggle to jump on trends, which means I’m usually a step behind early adopters when it comes to catching up with cutting-edge information.
That said, I also make a living partly because of my ability to observe carefully, so finding the right balance is tricky.
Since I naturally tend to seek stability, maybe consciously making an effort to follow trends is just the right approach for me.

Memo: Personal Stance on Technical Debt from Vibe Coding (2026-01-15 version)

If neither the reviewee nor reviewer can explain “why this was done this way” and “what this enables” for the code under review, it becomes debt the moment it’s merged—whether written by hand or by AI.

This is the type of debt where unexplainable code creeps into an ideally fully-explainable codebase as a broken window.

Deciding not to maintain a fully-explainable state is absolutely a valid decision.

However, production services in the real world aren’t run pastorally enough to simply accept that.